Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 160(6): 1479-1485.e5, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31706553

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Del Nido cardioplegia (DC) offers prolonged single-dose myocardial protection in pediatric cardiac surgery. We set out to evaluate the efficacy of DC in adult patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: From January 2012 to October 2017, 851 consecutive isolated CABG surgeries were performed by 2 study surgeons at our center with blood cardioplegia (BC, n = 350), used from January 2012 to April 2014, and DC (n = 501), used from May 2014 to October 2017. Propensity matching was used to yield 325 well-matched pairs. Clinical data were extracted from our local Society of Thoracic Surgeons database and mortality data from the Michigan State Social Security Death Index. RESULTS: Single-dose administration was used in 83% (417/501) of patients receiving DC. In propensity-matched groups, postoperative median troponin T levels (0.28 [0.16-0.59] ng/mL vs 0.46 [0.27-0.81] ng/mL; P < .01) were lower for patients receiving DC, and no difference in ejection fraction on postoperative echocardiography was observed (54 ± 12% and 53 ± 13% for BC and DC, respectively; P = .36). Perioperative outcomes were similar except for greater rate of atrial fibrillation (33% vs 23%; P = .01) in the DC group. Subgroup analyses revealed equivalent myocardial protection and clinical outcomes in patients with age ≥75 years, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, left main disease, or Society of Thoracic Surgeons score ≥2.5%. Four-year survival did not differ between patients undergoing BC or DC. CONCLUSIONS: The current study revealed noninferior myocardial protection and clinical outcomes with DC versus BC in both routine and greater-risk patients undergoing isolated CABG. DC demonstrated the feasibility of single-dose administration for isolated CABG surgery. Larger randomized studies are needed to further explore the safety and efficacy of DC in adult cardiac surgery with longer crossclamp times.


Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Parada Cardíaca Induzida/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Soluções Cardioplégicas/administração & dosagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29104016

RESUMO

del Nido cardioplegia (DC) offers prolonged cardiac protection with single-dose administration and has been shown to be safe in adult CABG surgery. We set out to evaluate the efficacy of cardiac protection and clinical outcomes of DC versus standard blood cardioplegia (BC) in minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. From August 2011 to May 2016, 178 patients underwent minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (mini-AVR) with BC (n = 101) or DC (n = 77). Ministernotomy or right minithoracotomy was utilized for surgical access. Clinical patient characteristics and data were extracted from our local Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database and the electronic medical record. Patients were propensity matched for age, gender, body mass index, valve size and type, STS score, surgical access, preop creatinine, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, yielding 63 well-matched pairs. There was no difference in patient age, preoperative creatinine, body mass index, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or STS score between BC and DC before or after propensity matching. BC patients received both anterograde and retrograde cardioplegias in multiple doses, whereas DC was delivered almost entirely anterograde with 95% of the patients (73/77) receiving a single dose only. DC was associated with decreased cardiopulmonary bypass time (108 ± 24 vs 135 ± 43 minutes, P = 0.001) and aortic cross-clamp time (80 ± 16 vs 102 ± 30 min, P = 0.001) and maximal glucose levels during cardiopulmonary bypass (165 ± 39 vs 202 ± 49 mg/dL, P = 0.001), whereas troponin T level did not differ between DC and BC (0.3 ± 0.29 vs 0.44 ± 1.7 ng/mL, P = 0.7). Preoperative ejection fraction did not change in either BC (64% ± 12% vs 61% ± 10%, P = 0.09) or DC (58% ± 14% vs 57% ± 14%, P = 0.4) after AVR. In minimally invasive AVR surgery, DC provided equivalent myocardial protection and clinical outcomes to BC while simplifying cardioprotective regimen and reducing aortic cross-clamp time. DC was associated with lower cardiopulmonary bypass glucose levels and demonstrated the feasibility of a single-dose administration.

3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28712580

RESUMO

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...